Why does an 8" × 16' log scale so differently by rule?
One small cut log. Seller and buyer need to see what changes when they name a different rule.
Enter these inputs
- DIB: 8 in at the small end, inside bark
- Nominal length: 16 ft
- Defect deduction: 0%
Calculator output
| Doyle | 16 gross BF |
|---|---|
| Scribner Decimal C | 30 gross BF |
| International 1/4-inch | 40 gross BF |
- Why the result differs
- Doyle's fixed 4-inch allowance hits small diameters hard. Scribner reads a published Decimal C table. International 1/4-inch uses different kerf and taper assumptions.
- What it means
- The log did not gain wood. A higher BF figure alone does not make an offer better.
- Takeaway
- Before comparing $/MBF, name the same rule, DIB method, length convention, and deduction basis.
- Boundary
- Gross scale for these inputs only — not mill recovery, not hidden defects.